| Organizing a Children's Movement in Election '08 |
|
|
With volunteers and partner organizations at our side, Every Child Matters has jumped into the Presidential election campaigns with an ambitious series of events to accomplish a formidable goal: getting the candidates to make children a priority and fulfilling that promise after the election. See our Events Calendar.
To start, we placed our grassroots organizing on a sound foundation of research. The release of the second edition of Homeland Insecurity lays bare the harms millions of children are facing and provides a realistic plan for investing in programs that can uplift children who are not getting enough food, schooling, parental support, or protection from abuse. All the polls indicate overwhelming support for increased government investment in children.
–Mick Schommer in Washington, DC Comments (6)
![]() written by Louis Logan, August 18, 2008
Thanks for taking a strong stand for kids! Louis Logan
written by Daniel, August 15, 2008
I'd say that if you want to take a partisan line (and please note, Every Child Matters is non-partisan, unless something has changed recently that I don't know about), I'd have to say that in general, the Republican party is way more "Pro-Death" than the Democratic party. For example, in your great state of South Carolina, where a defendant can be executed without even being a murderer (so the whole "eye-for-an-eye" thing really doesn't work there), the leadership is Republican. Your Senators and Governor are Republican, and there, according to the SC Department of Corrections website , "[t]he youngest person executed was a 14 year old black male." A 14 year old probably should have not even been tried as an adult, much less executed. Maybe all he needed was a little help, but I guess sometimes it's easier to take a life than to try to help.
So what was that about Democrats being pro-death? I'd also like to point out that many Republican's who are so strongly opposed to abortion are the same people who want to ban sexual education and contraception, and there wouldn't be as many abortions, no matter how legal, if there were better education on the issue. Some Republicans are now even pushing to classify certain forms of contraception as abortion, which is not only wrong, but will do nothing to help the children we already have who need our help. More to the point, I read an article by Steven Waldman about Joel Hunter today that makes an interesting point on abortion. Basically what Mr. Hunter says is that rather than playing the partisan blame-game and trying to paint Democrats and Obama as abortion-craving monsters who practice infanticide, or trying to overturn Roe v. Wade, we should provide pregnant women with more financial and social support, which is just what the new Democratic abortion plank says (see below). To quote Mr. Hunter, "With eight years of Bush the abortion rates have not declined. Every indication is that with financial support and different forms of supporting pregnant mother and then some post birth help also we could come close to 50% reduction in abortions. That's huge. That's huge." The Plank Reads: "The Democratic Party also strongly supports a woman's decision to have a child by ensuring access to and availability of programs for pre and post natal health care, parenting skills, income support, and caring adoption programs." Sadly, there are many children in this great nation that don't have families and homes. It's a terrible state of affairs to be sure, but I don't think that you can make the argument that the Republican party cares any more about children or children's issues like health-care and education any more than the Democratic party does. Furthermore this shouldn't be about partisan politics in the first place. Save your rant for a liberal or conservative blog; the focus here shouldn't be one a particular political party or the other, or abortion, it should be on all the children that need our help. Sources SCDoC: http://www.doc.sc.gov/news/deathrow.jsp#execution http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/2008/08/dissecting-the-democrats-new-a.html http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/2008/08/joel-hunter-democrats-could-st.html written by Max J. Kaster, August 14, 2008
You sure can't count on the Democrat Party having any concern for children, since their current leader, Barak Obama, would not support Illinois State legislation that would protect the life of a baby who survives the abortion attempt on its life. Further, the Democrat Party Platform now takes the strongest stand in history against the life of an un-born child, advocating almost unlimited slaughter of the unborn for any reason, and at any point in the gestation period.
You might find some compassion for children among the rank and file Democrats, but the leadership is "Pro-Death" when it comes to the un-born child. Max J. Kaster, Pastor Vice Chairman, Foster Care Review Board 1-A State of South Carolina written by Aung, August 05, 2008 Yeah, I'll be there with kids, and any others I can round up! written by Louise W. Wiener, July 30, 2008
It's about time. I am thrilled to see this level of organization and visibility and ready to help in any way I can. Bravo to the organizers. Louise Wiener
Write comment
|






Yeah, I'll be there with kids, and any others I can round up!
